2015년 12월 14일 월요일
Reflections on "Climate change"
It's almost mid-December, but the weather is unbelievably warm compared to before. I like it that it's not too cold, but at the same time I'm worried about the world's climate change. The main reason of this "warm" weather is because of the global warming, which we, humans, cause the Earth to get hotter by our activities. There have been many international talks to discuss protecting the world's environment and one of them was held in Paris last week, "COP21". It aimed to curb global warming to less than 2C (3.6F) by the end of the century. We all should put our efforts to protect our planet.
Reflections on "Stress" - How do you usually cope with stress?
How do you usually cope with stress?
Since I love to travel, I try to go abroad during vacation when I have so extra classes. For me traveling itself refreshes and gives me a lot of energy to see my life in a better way. Also, it makes me realize and be thankful of what I have now. I'd like to see and experience different cultures and people as much as I can. =)
Since I love to travel, I try to go abroad during vacation when I have so extra classes. For me traveling itself refreshes and gives me a lot of energy to see my life in a better way. Also, it makes me realize and be thankful of what I have now. I'd like to see and experience different cultures and people as much as I can. =)
2015년 12월 6일 일요일
reflections on "euthanasia"
Euthanasia is the practice of ending life intentionally. I have thought of this topic several times in my life during some classes, and whenever I think of it, it's a very difficult question to answer. However, if I have to take one side, I'm against euthanasia. I think human don't have a right to decide when to die. Rather, we have a right to care for and preserve life. The word "mercy killing" sounds very scary to me, and I don't think killing itself has a 'mercy' in it.
2015년 12월 2일 수요일
Reflections on "meaningful lives".
Almost every day we hear news about people worldwide who dedicate their lives or donate money or do something good to make a better world. Yesterday I heard the news that the founder of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, vowed to donate 99% of Facebook shares for charity. I think living your life meaningful is something like this. I don't mean that we should donate money to society, but giving a hand to people who need help will be a great donation for everyone.
2015년 11월 8일 일요일
Reflections on Korean historical movies.
Why do Korean people like historical movie?
I go to a theater to watch Korean movies because I'd like to see how the movie portrays history. History never changes, but it is interesting to see how it is interpreted in different ways. Since we didn't live in those days, watching Korean historical movies is fun and educational as well.
I go to a theater to watch Korean movies because I'd like to see how the movie portrays history. History never changes, but it is interesting to see how it is interpreted in different ways. Since we didn't live in those days, watching Korean historical movies is fun and educational as well.
Reflections on "Ageing".
Ageing means getting old. When I was in my 20s or younger, I was afraid of turning to 30s. At the age of 29 was one of the hardest times in my life with many thoughts and worries. I was chased by something I didn't know. I guess I was just afraid of being an adult. However, after I turned to 30, I don't feel that way. I know the age is just a number, even though age, the number, affects a lot in life many ways.
Reflections on "Beauty"
What is true beauty?
Our society put so much pressure on our looks that we all care a lot about how we look. Even if there is a famous saying "Don't judge the book by its cover.", but does it work? We place a lot of importance on the first impression. Some people have difficult times in getting jobs because of their look. People's opinion towards plastic surgery also have changed a lot in a positive way that it is a good thing because it will give you better self-image and confidence. But is it always working in this way? Some people are never be pleased with themselves. Find your beauty inside yourself. Others will see it if you are truly love yourself.
2015년 10월 19일 월요일
Students' Use of Cell Phones in School Should be Banned.
Cell phones have become an essential part of our lives and the ages of getting first cell phones are getting younger and younger. Most of elementary students have their own cell phones, and almost all of middle schoolers have them. As a middle school teacher, I think cell phone uses in school should be banned in several reasons.
Cell phones distract students.
Cell phones has been developed significantly and now "smartphones" can do almost everything that we can do with computers. Nowadays, students not only can text and make calls with their mobile phones, they can also play games, surf the internet and listen to music. All these features could interfere with students' concentration and ability to learn and study if they are allowed to use their cell phones in class.Cell phones interrupt lessons.
Although students are told to turn off their cell phones during classes, there are always cases of ringing and vibrating phones during lessons. This not only bother other students but also interrupt the flow of lessons.Cell phones can be used as a tool for cheating
All nation-organized tests don't allow for students to take their cell phones with them in classroom. Students have to hand in their cell phones while taking tests, otherwise, whether they use it or not, it can be considered as a possible cheating attempts based only on the facts that they don't hand them in. Likewise, there is possibility of children having access to the information during school exams using their phones, such as searching answers online or texting to someone who can give them answers.Cell phones can get stolen.
Cell phones these days are one of the most expensive items one carry. Schools are where a number of people spend many hours together. For example, there are possilibities you can get stolen your phones while leaving them in classroom to go to the gym for P.E. class and so on. If cell phones get stolen in school, who will be responsible for this? School? Teacher?2015년 10월 14일 수요일
3. Reflections on Volkswagen’s falsification of Pollution Tests
Before the scandal is reported, I didn't realize how badly diesel cars can affect on the environment. In Korea since the price of diesel is cheaper than gasoline, more and more people are getting interested in buying diesel cars. Thereby, Korean car companies have started to make their cars in diesel lines as well. There are pros and cons on both diesel-powered cars and gasoline-powered ones. I think although the price of diesel is cheaper than gasoline now, since the scandal gets big attention worldwide and people now have more knowledge on them, governments and consumers should think of future cars for environment.
2015년 10월 13일 화요일
2. Reflections on the Water Shortage Problems
I think water shortage is one of the biggest problems we should care and address. The problem is not limited to a few countries or areas but it's a global issue that we all should put our efforts together to deal with. Korea is also classed as water shortage country. I was shocked to hear that the amount of water Koreans use is the highest in the world. Even though we don't feel that we are short of water in our lives, as long as we know Korea is one of the water shortage countries, we should all try to save water.
2015년 10월 6일 화요일
1. Reflections on the Syrian Refugee Crisis
Before the Syrian refugee crisis was broken and the details became known to worldwide, I didn't know what was going on in Syria. I saw the news, and thought I should have looked it up, so when the professor brought it in class, I was very interested. I got some ideas in class and on that weekend I looked it up more details, and found out a lot of things were and are still going on in Syria. I was surprised that there have been civil wars for a long time, but it hasn't fixed until this refugee crisis got worse this far. While I was googling I also saw a few videos of Angelina Jolie's speech in UN about Syria. I felt so sad the more I saw the news, pictures and stories of these refugees. I hope the whole world will put their efforts together to help them. Also I think strong actions should be taken on Syria's problems.
2015년 10월 3일 토요일
Discussion Questions
What did you think of VW before the scandal?
What do you think of the VW scandal?
What do you think of diesel cars?
Which one do you think is better, a petrol car or a diesel car, and why?
How much more would you pay for an environmentally-friendly car?
Would you like to own a hybrid or electric car?
Which do you prefer, Korean cars or foreign cars? why?
What do you think of foreign cars? German (BMZ, VW, mercedes-benz, etc), Japanese (Toyota, Honda, Nissan, etc), American (Ford, GMC, chevrolet, etc)....
What's your dream car? What brand of cars in the world do you like the most? why?
What do you think of the VW scandal?
What do you think of diesel cars?
Which one do you think is better, a petrol car or a diesel car, and why?
How much more would you pay for an environmentally-friendly car?
Would you like to own a hybrid or electric car?
Which do you prefer, Korean cars or foreign cars? why?
What do you think of foreign cars? German (BMZ, VW, mercedes-benz, etc), Japanese (Toyota, Honda, Nissan, etc), American (Ford, GMC, chevrolet, etc)....
What's your dream car? What brand of cars in the world do you like the most? why?
Volkswagen’s falsification of pollution tests opens the door to a very different car industry
http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21666226-volkswagens-falsification-pollution-tests-opens-door-very-different-car
EMISSIONS of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and other nasties from cars’ and lorries’ exhausts cause large numbers of early deaths—perhaps 58,000 a year in America alone, one study suggests. So the scandal that has engulfed Volkswagen (VW) this week is no minor misdemeanour or victimless crime (see article). The German carmaker has admitted that it installed software on 11m of its diesel cars worldwide, which allowed them to pass America’s stringent NOx-emissions tests. But once the cars were out of the laboratory the software deactivated their emission controls, and they began to spew out fumes at up to 40 times the permitted level. The damage to VW itself is immense. But the events of this week will affect other carmakers, other countries and the future of diesel itself.
VW first. Its chief executive, Martin Winterkorn, has resigned, and the company is setting aside €6.5 billion ($7.3 billion) to cover the coming financial hit. But investors fear worse: in the first four trading days since the scandal broke on September 18th, VW’s shares fell by one-third, cutting its value by €26 billion. Once all the fines, compensation claims, lawsuits and recall costs have been added up, this debacle could be to the German carmaking giant what Deepwater Horizon was to BP. At least BP’s oil-drilling disaster was an accident; this was deliberate. America’s Department of Justice is quite right to open a criminal investigation into the company. Other countries should follow South Korea and probe what VW has been up to on their patch. Though few Chinese motorists buy diesel cars, the scandal may prompt its government to tackle the firm for overstating fuel-economy figures for petrol engines.
Whether or not Mr Winterkorn bore any personal responsibility for the scandal, it was appropriate that he should lose his job over it. He is an engineer who is famous for his attention to detail; if he didn’t know about the deceptive software, he should have. Selling large numbers of “Clean Diesels” was central to VW’s scheme for cracking the American market, a weak spot, which in turn was a vital part of the plan to overtake Toyota of Japan as the world’s largest carmaker. The grand strategy that Mr Winterkorn had overseen now lies in ruins.
A change at the top, and a hefty fine, must not be the end of the matter. America’s prosecutors ought to honour their promise to go after the individuals responsible for corporate crimes, instead of just punishing companies’ shareholders by levying big fines. Most of the recent banking scandals have ended not in the courtroom, but in opaque settlements and large fines. Earlier this month the Department of Justice announced a $900m settlement with GM, America’s largest carmaker, for failing to recall cars with an ignition-switch defect blamed for crashes which killed at least 124 people and injured 275. Prosecutors said (unnamed) managers at GM had knowingly ignored the potentially deadly effects of the fault, and put profit before safety. Yet they announced no charges.
That has to change—and the authorities know it. In a speech this month, America’s deputy attorney-general, Sally Yates, said that from now on, fining businesses would take second place to pursuing criminal and civil charges against individuals. An accused firm will no longer get credit for co-operating with investigations (as VW says it will) unless it gives the feds the names of every manager or employee involved in wrongdoing, and seeks to gather and submit evidence of their personal responsibility. VW is a test of this new approach. But to avoid suspicions of being tougher on foreign firms—as were raised in the BP Deepwater case and in recent banking settlements—the American authorities should also prosecute culpable GM managers.
Yet the biggest effects of the scandal will be felt across the Atlantic. VW’s skulduggery raises the question of whether other carmakers have been up to similar tricks, either to meet Europe’s laxer standards on NOx emissions or its comparable ones on fuel economy—and hence on emissions of carbon dioxide. BMW and Mercedes, VW’s two main German peers, rushed to insist that they had not. However, in Europe, emissions-testing is a farce. The carmakers commission their own tests, and regulators let them indulge in all sorts of shenanigans, such as removing wing mirrors during testing, and taping up the cracks around doors and windows, to reduce drag and thus make the cars burn less fuel. Regulators also tolerate software a bit like VW’s, that spots when a car is being tested and switches the engine into “economy” mode. This is why the fuel efficiency European motorists achieve on the road is around 40% short of carmakers’ promises.
At least America’s regulators, unlike Europe’s, sometimes stage their own tests to verify the manufacturers’ findings. But it is time this whole system was swept away and replaced, everywhere, with fully independent testing of cars in realistic driving conditions. Now, with outrage at VW’s behaviour at its height, is the moment to act. That would mean overcoming the objections of carmakers. But it also requires European regulators to change their attitudes to diesel, which accounts for half of cars sold on the continent. Diesel vehicles can be very economical on fuel (and thus emit relatively little carbon dioxide) but often at the cost of increased NOx emissions. That trade-off has been decided in diesel’s favour by Europe’s lousy testing regime and more lenient NOx-emissions standards.
A scandal in the motor industry
Dirty secrets
Volkswagen’s falsification of pollution tests opens the door to a very different car industry
EMISSIONS of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and other nasties from cars’ and lorries’ exhausts cause large numbers of early deaths—perhaps 58,000 a year in America alone, one study suggests. So the scandal that has engulfed Volkswagen (VW) this week is no minor misdemeanour or victimless crime (see article). The German carmaker has admitted that it installed software on 11m of its diesel cars worldwide, which allowed them to pass America’s stringent NOx-emissions tests. But once the cars were out of the laboratory the software deactivated their emission controls, and they began to spew out fumes at up to 40 times the permitted level. The damage to VW itself is immense. But the events of this week will affect other carmakers, other countries and the future of diesel itself.
Winterkorn is going
VW first. Its chief executive, Martin Winterkorn, has resigned, and the company is setting aside €6.5 billion ($7.3 billion) to cover the coming financial hit. But investors fear worse: in the first four trading days since the scandal broke on September 18th, VW’s shares fell by one-third, cutting its value by €26 billion. Once all the fines, compensation claims, lawsuits and recall costs have been added up, this debacle could be to the German carmaking giant what Deepwater Horizon was to BP. At least BP’s oil-drilling disaster was an accident; this was deliberate. America’s Department of Justice is quite right to open a criminal investigation into the company. Other countries should follow South Korea and probe what VW has been up to on their patch. Though few Chinese motorists buy diesel cars, the scandal may prompt its government to tackle the firm for overstating fuel-economy figures for petrol engines.
Whether or not Mr Winterkorn bore any personal responsibility for the scandal, it was appropriate that he should lose his job over it. He is an engineer who is famous for his attention to detail; if he didn’t know about the deceptive software, he should have. Selling large numbers of “Clean Diesels” was central to VW’s scheme for cracking the American market, a weak spot, which in turn was a vital part of the plan to overtake Toyota of Japan as the world’s largest carmaker. The grand strategy that Mr Winterkorn had overseen now lies in ruins.
A change at the top, and a hefty fine, must not be the end of the matter. America’s prosecutors ought to honour their promise to go after the individuals responsible for corporate crimes, instead of just punishing companies’ shareholders by levying big fines. Most of the recent banking scandals have ended not in the courtroom, but in opaque settlements and large fines. Earlier this month the Department of Justice announced a $900m settlement with GM, America’s largest carmaker, for failing to recall cars with an ignition-switch defect blamed for crashes which killed at least 124 people and injured 275. Prosecutors said (unnamed) managers at GM had knowingly ignored the potentially deadly effects of the fault, and put profit before safety. Yet they announced no charges.
That has to change—and the authorities know it. In a speech this month, America’s deputy attorney-general, Sally Yates, said that from now on, fining businesses would take second place to pursuing criminal and civil charges against individuals. An accused firm will no longer get credit for co-operating with investigations (as VW says it will) unless it gives the feds the names of every manager or employee involved in wrongdoing, and seeks to gather and submit evidence of their personal responsibility. VW is a test of this new approach. But to avoid suspicions of being tougher on foreign firms—as were raised in the BP Deepwater case and in recent banking settlements—the American authorities should also prosecute culpable GM managers.
Yet the biggest effects of the scandal will be felt across the Atlantic. VW’s skulduggery raises the question of whether other carmakers have been up to similar tricks, either to meet Europe’s laxer standards on NOx emissions or its comparable ones on fuel economy—and hence on emissions of carbon dioxide. BMW and Mercedes, VW’s two main German peers, rushed to insist that they had not. However, in Europe, emissions-testing is a farce. The carmakers commission their own tests, and regulators let them indulge in all sorts of shenanigans, such as removing wing mirrors during testing, and taping up the cracks around doors and windows, to reduce drag and thus make the cars burn less fuel. Regulators also tolerate software a bit like VW’s, that spots when a car is being tested and switches the engine into “economy” mode. This is why the fuel efficiency European motorists achieve on the road is around 40% short of carmakers’ promises.
At least America’s regulators, unlike Europe’s, sometimes stage their own tests to verify the manufacturers’ findings. But it is time this whole system was swept away and replaced, everywhere, with fully independent testing of cars in realistic driving conditions. Now, with outrage at VW’s behaviour at its height, is the moment to act. That would mean overcoming the objections of carmakers. But it also requires European regulators to change their attitudes to diesel, which accounts for half of cars sold on the continent. Diesel vehicles can be very economical on fuel (and thus emit relatively little carbon dioxide) but often at the cost of increased NOx emissions. That trade-off has been decided in diesel’s favour by Europe’s lousy testing regime and more lenient NOx-emissions standards.
See no diesel
Even if other makers of diesel vehicles have not resorted to the same level of deception as VW, the scandal could mean that these cars struggle to meet standards applied rigorously to both types of emission. Some fear that this may be the “death of diesel”. So be it. There is still scope to improve the venerable petrol engine; and to switch to cleaner cars that run on methane, hydrogen and electricity, or are hybrids. A multi-billion-dollar race is already under way between these various technologies, with makers often betting on several of them as the way to meet emissions targets. If VW’s behaviour hastens diesel’s death, it may lead at last, after so many false starts, to the beginning of the electric-car age.2015년 9월 6일 일요일
피드 구독하기:
글 (Atom)